HJRES 418 · 101th Congress · Environmental Protection

Calling for the United States to encourage immediate negotiations toward a new agreement among Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties, for the full protection of Antarctica as a global ecological commons.

Introduced 1989-10-05· Sponsored by Rep. Owens, Wayne [D-UT-2]· House

Bill Progress

1
Introduced
Committee
House Vote
4
Senate
5
Enacted
Latest: See S.J.Res.206.(1990-11-16)

Recorded Votes

PassedHouse · 1990-10-01
Roll #395
Yea 398Nay 11
Democrats
244 Yea·1 Nay
Republicans
154 Yea·10 Nay
PassedHouse · 1990-10-01
Roll #395
Yea 398Nay 11
Democrats
244 Yea·1 Nay
Republicans
154 Yea·10 Nay

How Did Your Rep Vote?

Enter a ZIP code or representative's name

Plain Language Summary

[AI summary unavailable — showing source text] Declares that: (1) Antarctica is a global ecological commons and should be managed under a new agreement among the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties or a protocol to the Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities which should for an indefinite period establish Antarctica as a region closed to commercial minerals development and related activities; (2) under such new agreement, information about minerals or other resources in Antarctica should be obtained under strictly controlled arrangements and should be openly shared in the international scientific community; (3) the Convention is not adequate to protect the environment of Antarctica and could stimulate commercial exploitation; (4) pending the negotiations and entry into force of a new agreement or protocol ensuring the full protection of Antarctica as a global ecological commons, the President should not present the Convention to the Senate for advice and consent to ratification; (5) the United States should support the interim measures presently in force among nations signatory to the Convention; and (6) the negotiation of such a new agreement or protocol should be a major item on the agenda of t…

Summarized by Claude AI · Non-partisan · For informational purposes only

Cosponsors (20)

20 Democrats