HRES 394 · 103th Congress · Congress

To express the sense of the House that Congress has a constitutional obligation to conduct oversight of matters related to the operation of the government.

Introduced 1994-03-22· Sponsored by Rep. Gephardt, Richard A. [D-MO-3]· House

Bill Progress

Introduced
2
Committee
House Vote
4
Senate
5
Enacted
Latest: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.(1994-03-22)

Recorded Votes

PassedHouse · 1994-03-22
Roll #78
Yea 408Nay 15
Democrats
235 Yea·15 Nay
Republicans
172 Yea·0 Nay
PassedHouse · 1994-03-22
Roll #78
Yea 408Nay 15
Democrats
235 Yea·15 Nay
Republicans
172 Yea·0 Nay

How Did Your Rep Vote?

Enter a ZIP code or representative's name

Plain Language Summary

[AI summary unavailable — showing source text] Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that: (1) Congress has a constitutional obligation to conduct oversight of matters relating to Government operations; (2) the Speaker and majority and minority leaders should meet to determine the appropriate timetable, procedures, and forum for appropriate congressional oversight, including hearings on all matters related to Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan Association, Whitewater Development Corporation, and Capital Management Services, Inc.; (3) no witness called to testify at these hearings shall be granted immunity under specified provisions of the Federal criminal code over the objection of Special Counsel Robert B. Fiske, Jr.; and (4) the hearings should be structured and sequenced so as not to interfere with the ongoing investigation of the Special Counsel.…

Summarized by Claude AI · Non-partisan · For informational purposes only

Cosponsors (1)

1 Republican