HR 267 · 113th Congress · Water Resources Development
Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013
Bill Progress
1
Introduced✓
Committee✓
House Vote✓
Senate✓
EnactedLatest: Became Public Law No: 113-23.(2013-08-09)
Recorded Votes
How Did Your Rep Vote?
Enter a ZIP code or representative's name
Plain Language Summary
[AI summary unavailable — showing source text]
Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 - Amends the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA) to increase from 5,000 to 10,000 kilowatts the size of small hydroelectric power projects which the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) may exempt from its license requirements. Amends the Federal Power Act to revise the limitation on the maximum installation capacity of qualifying conduit hydropower facilities that are eligible for an exemption from licensing requirements. Requires any person, state, or municipality proposing to construct a qualifying conduit hydropower facility to file with FERC a notice of intent to do so. Requires FERC, within 15 days after receiving such a notice of intent, to make an initial determination as to whether the facility meets the qualifying criteria. Waives license requirements for any conduit hydroelectric facility that: (1) uses for electric power generation only the hydroelectric potential of a non-federally owned conduit, (2) has a maximum installed capacity of 5 megawatts, and (3) is not currently licensed or exempted from license requirements. Redefines "conduit" to specify any tunnel, canal, pipeline, aqueduct, …
Summarized by Claude AI · Non-partisan · For informational purposes only
CBO Cost Estimate
Congressional Budget OfficeH.R. 267, the Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013
Feb 1, 2013As ordered reported by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on January 22, 2013
Full CBO report ↗H.R. 267, Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013
May 15, 2013As ordered reported by the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on May 8, 2013
Full CBO report ↗Official non-partisan budget analysis by the Congressional Budget Office
Cosponsors (9)
5 Democrats4 Republicans