HRES 644 · 113th Congress · Armed Forces and National Security

Condemning and disapproving of the failure of the Obama administration to comply with the lawful statutory requirement to notify Congress before transferring individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and expressing concern about the national security risks over the transfer of five Taliban leaders and the repercussions of negotiating with terrorists.

Introduced 2014-06-25· Sponsored by Rep. Rigell, E. Scott [R-VA-2]· House

Bill Progress

Introduced
Committee
House Vote
4
Senate
5
Enacted
Latest: The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.(2014-09-09)

Recorded Votes

PassedHouse · 2014-09-09
Roll #485
Yea 249Nay 163
Democrats
22 Yea·163 Nay
Republicans
227 Yea·0 Nay
PassedHouse · 2014-09-09
Roll #485
Yea 249Nay 163
Democrats
22 Yea·163 Nay
Republicans
227 Yea·0 Nay

How Did Your Rep Vote?

Enter a ZIP code or representative's name

Plain Language Summary

[AI summary unavailable — showing source text] Condemns and disapproves of the Obama administration's failure to comply with the lawful 30-day statutory reporting requirement in releasing the five senior Taliban members from detention at U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Expresses concern over: (1) national security implications that may arise from the Taliban members' release; and (2) the repercussions of negotiating with terrorists, and the risk that such negotiations may further encourage hostilities and the abduction of Americans. Stipulates that further violations of appropriate law are unacceptable. Declares misgivings about the prospect of any similar transfers from Guantanamo, even if undertaken pursuant to statutory requirements. States that the Obama administration's release of the five detainees has burdened unnecessarily the trust in the administration's commitment and ability to work with the legislative branch, and therefore works against the best interest of the people of the United States.…

Summarized by Claude AI · Non-partisan · For informational purposes only

Cosponsors (20)

2 Democrats18 Republicans